Legal Opinion

Transammonia Export Corporation, Cross v. Conserv, Inc., Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1977No. 75-3696PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this breach of contract action is whether sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict. In its general verdict the jury necessarily decided that an oral contract for the sale of anhydrous ammonia existed between the parties but that the plaintiff should not receive the full amount of its alleged damages. The defendant-appellee, Conserv, Inc., challenges the imposition of liability for breach of the oral contract; the plaintiff-appellant, Transammonia Export Corp., challenges the amount of damages awarded. We reject both appeals.

I

Transammonia, an exporter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. DunlapSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Southwest Engineering Co., Inc. v. Martin Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Johnston v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. St. Joe Corp. v. McIverSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. American Carpet Mills, Division of Keller Industries, Inc. v. The Gunny CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Batista v. Walter & BernsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API