Legal Opinion

James G. McCarrick Co. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1950No. 12045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

The question involved in this case is whether or not the “Statement of Protest” addressed to the terminal carrier but delivered to the Railroad Perishable Inspection Agency complies with the requirements of Section 2(b) of a Uniform Straight Bill of Lading, which provides that: “As a condition precedent to recovery, claims must be filed in writing with the' receiving or delivering carrier, or carrier issuing this bill of lading, or carrier on whose line the loss, damage, injury or delay occurred, within nine months after delivery of the property. * * * Where claims are not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. McNattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Texas & N. O. R. v. Gulf Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. James G. McCarrick Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API