Burgess v. Carmichael
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiffs Cathy Burgess, Elum Burgess, and Shela Burgess (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from district court’s dismissal with prejudice of their pro se civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We determine, first, that Plaintiffs have alleged or attempted to allege facts which suggest that they could state claims of disability discrimination in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and they accordingly must be given an opportunity to amend their complaint. We also…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- (PS) Serris v. ChastaineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PS) Serris v. ChastaineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Burgess v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Jasso v. AbelsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Jody Wilson Jasso; Elena V.H. Singleton; M.M. Jasso v. Oregon Attorney General; et al.District Court, D. Oregon · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.