Cooper v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for kidnapping and aggravated assault with intent to rape. Held:
1. Defendant asserts that he is entitled to a new trial because a full verbatim transcript of the proceedings was not made in that there were omissions.
We find no merit in this assertion.
In addition to defendant not showing any harm or prejudice by the omissions (Rutledge v. State, 245 Ga. 768 (4), 773 (267 SE2d 199)), there is nothing in the record to show that the trial court was asked to follow the procedures of Code Ann. § 6-805 (f) (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24).
“[W]here the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moses v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Wallin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Ivory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Rose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Jeffery Bully v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020