Legal Opinion

Large v. McClain

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

.October Term, 1886, No. 238, W, D., before Gordon, Paxson, Trunket, Green, and Clark, JJ. Error to the Common Pleas No. 1 of Allegheny County to review a judgment for plaintiff in an action of covenant. This action was brought by J ames McClain against John R. Large, administrator of William Pollock, deceased, and the heirs at law of said William Pollock, to recover one half the amount of a collateral inheritance tax.

Read the full summary

.October Term, 1886, No. 238, W, D., before Gordon, Paxson, Trunket, Green, and Clark, JJ. Error to the Common Pleas No. 1 of Allegheny County to review a judgment for plaintiff in an action of covenant. This action was brought by J ames McClain against John R. Large, administrator of William Pollock, deceased, and the heirs at law of said William Pollock, to recover one half the amount of a collateral inheritance tax. The facts as they appeared in the court below are as follows: In the year 1866, and for some years prior thereto, the title to a tract of land, containing about 200 acres,…

1Per curiam

The law of this case is so well expressed in the opinion of the 'learned judge of the court below that we think it unnecessary to add anything thereto.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Taylor v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API