Legal Opinion

Williams v. Golden

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1992No. 91-CA-2295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Cheryl and Samuel Williams, appeal a trial court judgment which sustained Dr. David A. Golden’s exception of prematurity. This judgment was based on the trial court’s finding that Dr. Golden was covered by the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act. If this finding is correct then the trial court correctly ruled that the suit was premature because the *714Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act requires that plaintiffs must first submit claims for medical malpractice to a panel of medical experts before they can file a lawsuit in district court. We reverse, because & health care…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abate v. Healthcare Intern., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Clark v. RansomLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. EuseaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. O'Bryan v. Patients Comp. Fund Over. Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Richard Dickson v. Dr. Isaac A. OduduLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API