Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Casualty Co. of America

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by defendant requiring plaintiffs to accept a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division.

1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.

The defendant moves for an order requiring the plaintiffs to accept a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division, Third Department, unanimously affirming a judgment of the Trial Term in an action brought upon an insurance contract in which a judgment of $1,055.43 has been recovered by the plaintiffs.

The defendant, Casualty Company of America, served upon the plaintiffs ’ attorney a notice of appeal, *474dated May 29, 1917, together with an undertaking as required by the Code, which notice and undertaking were returned by plaintiffs’ attorney on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Troy Steel & Iron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hartigan v. Casualty Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API