Legal Opinion

State v. Rinkes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1967No. 38452, 38446, 38441PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finley, C. J. —

This is a consolidated appeal on an agreed statement of facts. The three defendant-appellants were tried together and convicted of grand larceny by possession of stolen plumbing supplies. Each was sentenced to a maximum of 15 years in the penitentiary. Defendants Rinkes and Thompson make three assignments of error. The first two relate to an allegedly prejudicial comment, not supported by the evidence, made by the prosecutor in his opening statement, and to the admission of evidence purportedly obtained in violation of defendant Thompson’s Fourth Amendment rights. The only…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. State v. MichaelsWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. John E. Burke v. United States of America, Leo C. Burke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  5. State v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of GlasmannWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Crowe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. LemieuxWashington Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API