Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1994No. 93-254PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This complex litigation between the State of Montana, the Montana Potato Improvement Association, the Montana Insurance Guaranty Association, and others has spanned fifteen years. In the present appeal, we are asked to determine whether the State has a valid indemnification claim against the guaranty association for $360,000 previously paid to an insurance company in settlement. We affirm the determination of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula Comity, that the State’s indemnification claim is a covered claim but conclude that the claim is statutorily limited to $300,000. A brief…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bobby Kitchens v. Miss. Ins. Guar. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Goodover v. Lindey's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. A. S. Abell Publishing Co. v. MezzanoteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Erker v. KesterMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Delaware v. K-Decorators, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pankratz Farms, Inc. v. PankratzMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Marsh v. OverlandMontana Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API