Legal Opinion

Erskine v. Kelly

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 22, 2024No. 6:20-cv-00254Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ROBERT LEE ERSKINE, Case No. 6:20-cv-00254-JE Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED BRANDON KELLY, Respondent. Anthony D. Bornstein, Federal Public Defender’s Office, 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1700, Portland, OR 97204. Attorney for Petitioner. Nick M. Kallstrom, Oregon Department of Justice, 1162 Court Street, NE, Salem, OR 97301. Attorney for Respondent. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Jelderks’s Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”), ECF 68, denying…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Roberts v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Bills v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Joseph Stancle v. Ivan ClayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API