Magana-Pizano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
With enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), Congress dramatically altered our immigration laws and judicial remedies for immigrants facing deportation or exclusion. To consider the proper jurisdiction for habeas corpus petitions and petitions for review of Board of Immigration Appeals decisions under the new statutes, we consolidated these actions. We dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, but hold that the petitioner may pursue habeas corpus…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6857, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9481 Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998