Legal Opinion

Lamendola v. Grossman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1983No. 83-1855PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

439 So.2d 960 (1983)

Sally LAMENDOLA and Joseph Lamendola, Her Husband, Petitioners,

v.

The Honorable Rhea Pincus GROSSMAN, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 83-1855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 18, 1983.

Rehearing Denied November 17, 1983.

Weaver, Weaver & Lardin and Marilyn P. Liroff, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and Roy Wood, Asst. County Atty., for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

2Per curiam

On the virtually indistinguishable authority…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDermott v. GrossmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Layne v. GrossmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town Centre of Islamorada, Inc. v. OverbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Jimenez v. RatineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Ennis v. EnnisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Perrotto v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Olszewska v. FerroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API