Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2017No. DA 14-0521PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 Richard Reynolds (Reynolds) appeals his conviction for securities fraud on speedy trial grounds and, alternatively, asks for a new trial on the basis that the District Court erred when instructing the jury. At trial, the District Court refused Reynolds’ proposed jury instructions, which included language regarding exemptions to the statutes under which he was charged—§§ 30-10-201(1) and -202(1), MCA. The District Court used the State’s proposed instructions instead, which omitted the references to the statutory exemptions. Reynolds’ objections to the District Court’s refusal of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. BieberMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. CybulskiMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. ArchambaultMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. CarnesMontana Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. M. ReynoldsMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. J. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. M. ReopelleMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. M. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State v. A. LaForge IIIMontana Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API