Huffaker v. Auert
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action in replevin. Judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
Replevin for an electric automobile. The court directed a verdict for defendant and plaintiff brings error. No brief is filed for defendants in error.
In August, 1917, plaintiff delivered the machine in question to defendants for repairs. He testifies in detail concerning the agreement between them. His evidence tends to prove that although the car remained with defendants from August to January 30th, the repairs were never completed; that the machine was considerably damaged by bad treatment, that nevertheless he tendered $80 and then $100, and demanded delivery but they refused.
The court was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. Tittabawassee Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Munson v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Hilger v. EdwardsNevada Supreme Court · 1869
- Hillsburg v. HarrisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892