Legal Opinion

Hanner v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from Lafayette Circuit Court. Hod. Myron D. Kent, Circuit Judge. It was error to strike out the amended complaint. Sillivant v. Reardon, 5 Ark., 140. The complaint was filed before the issuing of the summons. Pleadings up to ordinary standard before justice’s courts. The case should be remanded.

1Opinion of the Court

Harrison, J.:

This was an-action of replevin, commenced before-a justice of the peace, for 3115 pounds of seed cotton and twenty-three bushels of corn.

On applying for the order of delivery, the plaintiffs filed an • affidavit, in accordance with section 5035, Gantt’s Digest, in which the value of the property was stated to be $166.62. The affidavit contained a particular statement of their cause of action, and they filed no other.

The defendant, after the property had been replevied, gave bond, and the same was restored to him. A jury trial was had, and there was a verdict and judgment for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Minchrod v. WindoesIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Burnham-Hanna-Munger Dry Goods Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Johnson v. TaborMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Climer v. AylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Schattler v. HeismanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API