State v. Maynes
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Montgomery District Court. ■ The defendant was indicted for an assault witli an intent to commit great bodily injury. He was convicted of assault and battery, and now appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, J\
— I. The first question presented arises upon the introduction of evidence. The state sought to prove the extent of the injury sustained by the prosecuting witness. One Williams had testified before the grand jury that he examined the prosecuting witness and found some swelling on the cheek, and found the sixth or seventh rib fractured. At the trial Williams was not present, but, by consent of the defendant, the minutes of his testimony before the grand jury were read in evidence as having the same effect that his testimony in the same words would, if given by him as a witness upon…
2Cited by3 opinions
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. HastySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- State v. GoldenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922