Legal Opinion
York v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 2, 2014No. 10 C 5098PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Chief Judge RUBÉN CASTILLO, United States District Court
Presently before the Court is Darvell D. York’s pro se motion for relief from the district court’s denial of his section 2255 petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies York’s Rule 60(b) motion, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
*1030BACKGROUND
Following a jury trial presided over by our departed colleague, Judge William J. Hibbler, York was found guilty of knowingly and intentionally…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Richard F. Harrington, Tavares Harrington, Tyjuan Kidd v. City of Chicago, Officer Delgado, Officer MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Rafael Nunez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Melvin P. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grant v. Merk (EMD) Milliporesigma Aldrich ChemicalDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Troupe v. MartinezDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- United States v. ChapmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018