Legal Opinion

Goudreau v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1985No. 49882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

The plaintiff property owners seek (a) a declaration that the defendant city’s ordinance for occupancy certificate fees is unconstitutional, and (b) an injunction against its enforcement by the defendant city officials. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and the property owners appeal. We reject the property owners’ claim that some factual issue precluded an adverse judgment and affirm the trial court’s decision.

I

In their complaint, the three plaintiffs assert that they are taxpayers and that each owns and operates a multiple-family dwelling in the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stromberg v. Bd. of Edn. of BratenahlOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Richmond Heights v. LoContiOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teamster's Housing, Inc. v. City of East ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Malcolm-Smith v. Goff, Unpublished Decision (10-21-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. T.W. Grogan Co. v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API