Legal Opinion

State v. Geier

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1985No. 15939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Robert Geier pled guilty and was convicted on three counts of omitting material facts in the sale of securities. The district court denied Geier’s request for a withheld judgment. Instead, the court entered a judgment of conviction and sentenced Geier to a suspended three-year term with nine years of probation. As conditions of probation, the court ordered Geier to make $42,000 in restitution to the defrauded investors, and to perform 2,500 hours of community service. On appeal, Geier contends the district court abused its discretion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. EdghillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. GonzalesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. BiasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. RollinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. CowgerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API