Legal Opinion
Noyes v. McDonnell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 26, 1965No. 40595PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
The plaintiff in error, Beulah E. Noyes, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, as the owner of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Block 19, Putnam Heights Addition to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, filed suit naming as defendants seven property owners in such addition. This addition consists of three blocks, to-wit: 19, 20 and 21, and was platted by Military Park Development Com pany by instrument dated September 28, 1907 and recorded November 6, 1907.
Under the dedication of this addition, which consists only of the three blocks mentioned, there is a plat restriction which reads as follows:
“Third:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Meter v. ManionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- McDowell v. DrozSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wood v. KnoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Perry Journal Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Sanders v. McCammonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
3Cited by11 opinions
- Asociación de Vecinos de Villa Caparra, Inc. v. Iglesia CatólicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
- Thomas v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Howell Petroleum Corp. v. Leben Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Mayfair Building Co. v. S & L ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- El Di, Inc. v. Town of Bethany BeachSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.