Legal Opinion
Arthur L. Burnam v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 8, 1982No. 81-2971PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
In Santise v. Schweiker, 676 F.2d 925 (3d Cir. 1982), in upholding the validity of the medical-vocational regulations used by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in making determinations of disability under the Social Security Act, 20 C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P (1981); id. pt. 416, subpt. I, we stressed that the four-factor decision “grids” established by those regulations “do not govern — and indeed were not intended to govern — all disability cases.” Santise, supra, 676 F.2d at 934. We observed that, by their own terms, the regulatory “rules…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roger Gagnon v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Santise v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
3Cited by50 opinions
- Clifton Sykes, Sr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, District of New Jersey the Honorable Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Dolores WALLACE, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Claire McDonald v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Catherine SZUBAK, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Simmonds v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.