Legal Opinion
Dare v. New York Cent. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 6, 1927No. 346PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit by the railroad company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against partners trading as E. H. Dare & Co., hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover freight charges on 28 carloads of oats carried in interstate commerce over the plaintiff’s rails.
The oats were shipped from Illinois and Wisconsin under order bills of lading running to various consignees in New York City. The bills of lading were indorsed in blank by the consignees and were pledged to defendants as security - for money loaned by them to Brainard Commission Company. The defendants then…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- New York Central Railroad v. Warren Ross Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- New York Cent. R. Co. v. Trans-American Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Western Grain Co. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- A/S Dampskibsselskabet Torm v. Beaumont Oil Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- A/S Dampskibsselskabet Torm v. Beaumont Oil Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Long Island Railroad v. Midland Valley Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.