Legal Opinion

Orr & Lindsey Shoe Co. v. Harris

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1891No. 3168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before Hon. Anson Rainey. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Judge,

Section B. — January 30, 1889, the appellees, Jim Harris and B. M. Lyon, brought separate suits by attachment in the District Court of Kaufman County against Bonds & Lyon, a firm composed of J. E. Bonds and W. H. Lyon. Harris sought to recover a debt of $3000, the amount of a note dated January 15, 1889, and maturing thirty days after date; Lyon to recover a debt of $3424.30, the aggregate amount of three promissory notes. The affidavit for attachment made by each of these plaintiffs set out as a ground for the writ “that the defendants were about to dispose of their property…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barker v. Abbott KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. San Antonio, U. & G. R. Co. v. BoboCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. John V. Farwell Co. v. McGrawColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. John V. Farwell Co. v. McGrawColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API