Legal Opinion

Jackson ex dem. Munroe v. Parkhurst

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1832PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case The Court decided that recitals in deeds of real estate are evidence against the party making them or any person claiming under him ? that they estop parties and privies—privies in blood, in estate and in law. I Phil. Ev. 411, ch, 8, § 2. Comyn's Dig. tit. Evidence, B. 5. 1 Salk, 285. 2 P. Wms. 432. Willes, 11. 1 Dallas, 67. 4 Binney, 231, 314. Jackson v. Carver, 4 Peter's S. C. R. 83. And that the defendants in this ease having entered into possession of the premises sought to be recovered, under one of the grantors in the deed produced by the plaintiff, containing recitals…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of Utica v. MersereauNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Lindsay v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wright v. DouglassNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Mattoon v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. President of the Chautauque County Bank v. RisleyNew York Supreme Court · 1847

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API