Legal Opinion

Hilden v. Ball

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1990No. 17394PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs sued defendant, alleging medical malpractice in defendant’s administration of anesthesia to Robert Hilden in preparation for surgery. The jury returned a *315verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs then moved for a new trial. The motion was denied and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiffs appeal.

Robert Hilden was scheduled to have a hemorrhoidectomy on July 12, 1984, by Dr. Hayden Ellingham at Cassia Memorial Hospital in Burley. Dr. James Ball was to provide anesthesia during the surgery. Because of Mr. Hilden’s obesity (440 pounds), Doctors Ellingham and Ball…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Dekker v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Holland v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Smallwood v. DickIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Manning v. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Newberry v. MartensIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Leazer v. KieferIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Fussell v. St. ClairIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API