Ziegler v. International Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved for a dismissal of the complaint for failure to prove negligence and freedom from contributory negligence; also because the proof affirmatively showed plaintiff guilty of negligence which was the cause of the accident. Thereupon the court said: “ I will grant the defendant’s motion.” We have no means of knowing the particular ground upon which the ruling rested. The judgment *44as entered, that is, the postea, adjudged “ that this action be and the same hereby is dismissed upon the merits, and that the defendant have judgment against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hollenbeck v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford, ConnecticutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Caruso v. Metropolitan 5 to 50 Cent StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Littrell v. Allemania Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hansen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- De Laurentis v. Seafarers Port O'Call Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Assalone v. HazelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Frank Kiebitz & Sons, Inc. v. BermanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1936
- In re the Accounting of City Bank Farmers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.