Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved for a dismissal of the complaint for failure to prove negligence and freedom from contributory negligence; also because the proof affirmatively showed plaintiff guilty of negligence which was the cause of the accident. Thereupon the court said: “ I will grant the defendant’s motion.” We have no means of knowing the particular ground upon which the ruling rested. The judgment *44as entered, that is, the postea, adjudged “ that this action be and the same hereby is dismissed upon the merits, and that the defendant have judgment against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hollenbeck v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford, ConnecticutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Caruso v. Metropolitan 5 to 50 Cent StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Littrell v. Allemania Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hansen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. De Laurentis v. Seafarers Port O'Call Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Assalone v. HazelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Frank Kiebitz & Sons, Inc. v. BermanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1936
  5. In re the Accounting of City Bank Farmers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API