Legal Opinion

Rodd v. Luxfer USA Ltd.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan D. Oshrin, J.

After a trial, a jury verdict and intermediate appeal, the plaintiff has submitted a proposed judgment. The defendants, Firematic Supply Company, Inc. and Southshore Fire and Safety Equipment Distributors, and the third-party defendant, Coram Fire District, have raised objections to the form of the judgment. The objections concern the Coram Fire District’s entitlement to a collateral source setoff in the amount of $150,000 for life insurance proceeds paid to Mrs. Rodd; the date for termination of postjudgment interest; the form of the judgment as to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Love v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Steitz v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Lucio v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Feldman v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API