Rodd v. Luxfer USA Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Oshrin, J.
After a trial, a jury verdict and intermediate appeal, the plaintiff has submitted a proposed judgment. The defendants, Firematic Supply Company, Inc. and Southshore Fire and Safety Equipment Distributors, and the third-party defendant, Coram Fire District, have raised objections to the form of the judgment. The objections concern the Coram Fire District’s entitlement to a collateral source setoff in the amount of $150,000 for life insurance proceeds paid to Mrs. Rodd; the date for termination of postjudgment interest; the form of the judgment as to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Love v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Steitz v. GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Lucio v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Feldman v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.