Legal Opinion

Head-Lipscomb-McCormick Co. v. City of Bristol

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 16, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Washington county. Decree for complainants. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Prentis. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Head-Lipscomb-McCormick Company, Inc., appellant, complains of a decree which sets aside and annuls a conveyance of what may be called the northern end of the Gauthier property, conveyed to it by the city of Bristol. After the conveyance, the city filed its bill, alleging that its contract and deed pursuant thereto were ultra vires and void for lack of power to convey, and certain citizens and taxpayers of the city, who felt aggrieved, were allowed to file their petition and were admitted as parties complainant.

*671For the better understanding of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. County of Alleghany v. ParrishSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  3. State v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
  4. Konrad v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ogden City v. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. Maryland-Washington Metropolitan DistrictCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Seltenreich v. Town of FairbanksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  3. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Baier v. City of Saint AlbansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Williamsburg v. LyellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API