Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Gottlieb

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 1914No. 8877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Rice, Marion, April, 1913. Action by Nathan Barnett against Samuel L. Gottlieb to recover damages for an assault. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Cross-examination of plaintiff in discretion of Judge: 73 S. C. 386 ; 33 S. C. 39.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

1 This was an action for damages for an assault and battery. The defendant was arrested, and held for bail, under ■ section 238 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1912. He furnished bail, and the cause was tried at the April term of the Court, 1913, before Judge Rice and a jury. The defendant did not appear in person, but was represented by counsel. The sureties on the defendant’s bond were also-represented by counsel. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. A motion for new trial was made and refused. Plaintiff appeals,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnett v. GottliebSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  2. Yancey v. Southern Wholesale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Pinson v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API