Legal Opinion

Home Ins. v. Tydal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1946No. 11371PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Grcuit Judge.

The motion for rehearing urgently insists that we are in error in saying: “In the federal system appellate courts do not normally review the verdict of the jury, but only the acts of the judge. The trial judge alone has the right and duty to set the verdict aside if dissatisfied with it”, and that it is our duty to scrutinize more closely the evidence and reconsider our suggestions as to how the jury might reasonably have reached the amount in the verdict they made. Because counsel so frequently call on us to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Herencia v. GuzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dowell, Inc. v. JowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  2. Een v. Consolidated FreightwaysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  3. Harnik v. LilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  4. Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal R. Of New Orleans v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Buchanan v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API