Legal Opinion

Cascade Telephone Co. v. State Tax Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1934No. 24975. En BancPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— The plaintiffs, corporations and individuals engaged in the business of furnishing telephone service, brought this action to restrain the state tax commission from enforcing upon and collecting from them the excise tax provided for in chapter 191 of Laws of 1933, p. 869 (Rem. 1933 Sup., § 8326-1 et seq.). A general demurrer to their complaint was interposed and sustained. The plaintiffs elected to stand upon their complaint, and a judgment dismissing the action followed, from which judgment the plaintiffs have appealed. The facts are therefore admitted.

The appellants all come under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Birdsall v. CarrickNevada Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Groves v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Washington State Legislature v. LowryWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Dickson v. SaizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API