Legal Opinion

Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 7, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Will Jones had judgment against the Atlantic Coast Line Railway Company, and on appeal to- the Court of Appeals, the judgment is affirmed. See 9 Ala. 499, 63 South. 693. The Atlantic Coast Line Railway Company brings certiorari to review the judgment and decision of the Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

This application for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals presents for review the action of that court as expressed in its opinion to he found in 9 Ala. App. 199, 63 South. 693, on the appeal thereto of Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Jones.

Counts 2 and 3% of the complaint were drawn to state a cause of action under the state Employers’ Liability Act. — Code, § 3910. Count 7 was drawn to state a canse of action under the federal Employers’ Liability Act.(1) Upon a review of the evidence, the Court of Appeals concluded that, at the time the injury complained of in the complaint was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Ex parte SteversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. American Central Insurance v. PepperAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Western Railway v. MaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Mathews v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API