Legal Opinion
Casella v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners are present and former employees holding the position of Chief Attorney of Grievance Committees in the Second and Third Judicial Departments. In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, they seek to annul respondents’ determination denying their application to upgrade their salary level from "JG 32” to "JG 34”, an order directing respondents to upgrade their salary level, and an award of back pay for the difference in salary from the date each petitioner was classified a "Chief Attorney”.
Upon the resignation of the Chief Counsel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rotunno v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P. C. v. BroderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Schwartz v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shelton v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Missry v. EhlichCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Matter of Mark Cerrone, Inc. v. ZemskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People ex rel. Farren v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999