United States v. Donald Harvey
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Donald Harvey appeals his convictions and his sentence for receipt of child pornography and possession of child pornography. Harvey argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea, that his sentence was substantively unreasonable, and that his two convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Harvey’s motion to withdraw his plea. But Harvey’s two convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause because they arise out of the same act or transaction.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MuhlenbruchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WarnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- United States v. Donald HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Farrell MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021