Legal Opinion
Fairmont Foods Company v. Clifford M. Hardin, Secretary of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 26, 1971No. 23808_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
This action was brought by the appellant Fairmont Foods to obtain review of a decision of the Secretary of Agriculture upholding the validity of a location differential provision of the Federal Milk Marketing Order for the Nebraska— Western Iowa Marketing area, 7 C.F.R. § 1065.51 (1965). The District Court sustained the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
I. The General Regulatory Scheme
Although the mechanics of milk regulation have been described elsewhere, 1 2 a brief review of the regulatory scheme will provide a helpful background for consideration…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Walter Holm & Company v. Clifford M. Hardin, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Jere L. Denton v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Heber Valley Milk Company v. Earl Butz, United States Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.