Legal Opinion
Horil v. Napko Paint Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1972No. 5127PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOULIG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment maintaining an exception of prescription filed by the defendant Roig’s Paint & Supplies, Inc. (Roig’s), against appellant’s action in redhibition. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The undisputed facts in this matter are that the plaintiff was personally undertaking the renovation of a multiple dwelling which he owned. Upon the recommendation of a representative of the codefendant, Napko Paint Company .(Napko), appellant on April 21, 1970, purchased from Roig’s (a retail outlet) a Sheetrock undercoat tex-turing material manufactured by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walton v. Katz & Besthoff, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Boyd v. J. C. Penny Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Peltier v. Seabird Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- Austin v. North American Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rider v. LeCompteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Jack Austin, D/B/A Jack Austin & Associates, Cross v. North American Forest Products, Cross-Appellants, and Glassow Sales Co., Cross-Appellant and Cross-Appellee v. Lifetime Doors, Inc., Cross-Appellee and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981