Legal Opinion

Benninghof-Nolan Co. v. Adcock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923No. 23,838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

Appellee recovered a judgment for $9,000 damages on account of personal injuries sustained in a collision between a motorcycle on which he was riding and an automobile driven by appellant Griffith while in the employ of the appellant company. Overruling the separate motions of appellants for a new trial is assigned as error, under which appellants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, insist that the damages were excessive and complain of instruction No. 5, given at plaintiff’s request.

The plaintiff (appellee) introduced evidence to the effect that he was riding his motorcycle at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. DudleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Union Traction Co. v. WynkoopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Christian v. Gates Rubber Co. Sales Division, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Christian v. Gates Rubber Co. Sales Division, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API