Legal Opinion

Myron's Ballroom v. United States

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 28, 1974No. 72-2842-AAH, 72-2843-AAHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (REFUND OF INCOME TAXES TO MYRON’S BALLROOM RESTAURANT AND COCKTAIL BAR BUSINESS)

HAUK, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 7 of the Rules of the Central District of California, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law after trial upon the facts without a jury.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. This is an action for refund of Federal Income Taxes paid by the plaintiffs for the fiscal years ending September 30, 1966, 1967 and 1968.

2. Plaintiffs, Myron’s Ballroom (Ballroom) and Myron’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Donruss Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bardahl Mfg. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  3. Bardahl Manufacturing Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Simons-Eastern Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Myron's Enterprises v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Central Motor Company v. United States of America, Central Credit Corporation v. United States of America, Cruces Credit Corporation v. United States of America, Red Rock Investment Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. Myron's Enterprises, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant. Myron's Ballroom, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Union Offset v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API