Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wimbley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2014No. CR-11-0076Published

1Dissent

WELCH, Judge;

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the holding in part I.B.2 of the main opinion that Corey Allen Wimbley’s confession was voluntary. Wimbley’s confession was coerced, and the error in its admission into evidence was not harmless; therefore, Wimbley’s convictions should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial or other proceedings.

At the beginning of Part I, in setting out the, applicable standard of review regarding a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, the main opinion quotes .cases addressing the applicable, standard when evidence has been presented…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API