Kaur v. Singh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*878In a family offense proceeding, the allegations asserted in a petition seeking the issuance of an order of protection must be supported by “a fair preponderance of the evidence” (Family Ct Act § 832; see Matter of Hasbrouck v Hasbrouck, 59 AD3d 621 [2009]; Matter of Patton v Torres, 38 AD3d 667, 668 [2007]; Matter of Dabbene v Dabbene, 297 AD2d 812 [2002]; Matter of Hogan v Hogan, 271 AD2d 533 [2000]). The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and that court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gray v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Luke v. LukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Dabbene v. DabbeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hasbrouck v. HasbrouckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hogan v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alam v. AlamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Campbell v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hubbard v. DeLeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kaur v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Jacobs v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.