Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hickey v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1989No. 19659Published

1Dissent

Steffen, J., with whom Mowbray, J., agrees,

dissenting:

Respectfully, I dissent.

I am unable to join in the majority opinion because of what I perceive to be a compellingly clear statute that mandates a contrary result.

NRS 62.360(4) specifically addresses the extent to which a minor’s juvenile court records may be utilized in civil actions. By its precise terms, only the juvenile’s name may be released and used in the action. Long ago, we declared as an elementary principle of statutory construction that if the language of a statute “is susceptible of but one natural, honest construction, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Walters' EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State ex rel. Copeland v. WoodburyNevada Supreme Court · 1883
  3. State v. California Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Nevada Tax Commission v. BernhardNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. Commissioners Washoe Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API