Second National Bank of Beloit v. Merrill
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Hock County. Garnishment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
This is another of the garnishee actions in the main action of the respondent bank against Merrill & Houston Iron Works, Sereno T. Merrill and 0. F. G. Collins, as set out in the preceding case, ante, p. 142. As the result of the trial of the garnishee issue, the circuit court found and adjudged the deed executed by S. T. Merrill to Jame B. Merrill, his wife, on November 28, 1882, of a triangular piece of land in the city of Beloit, was so made with intent to defraud creditors, and is void, and other *153things hereafter mentioned. The following are believed to be the main facts established by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gray v. . BartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Dice v. IrvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Henschel v. MaurerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brader v. BraderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Morrish v. MorrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Fawcett v. FawcettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Charmley v. CharmleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.