Legal Opinion

Luckett v. Uber Technologies Inc

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 2, 2025No. 3:25-cv-01092Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DENNIS LUCKETT, § Plaintiff, § § V. § No. 3:25-CV-1092-G-BW § UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., § Defendant. § Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge1 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On May 9, 2025, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) filed a Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (Dkt. No. 6 (“Mot.”)) with supporting brief (Dkt. No. 7 (“D. Br.”) and appendix (Dkt. No. 7-1 (“D. App.”)). Plaintiff Dennis Luckett filed an “Objection” to Uber’s motion on May 13, 2025…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Webb v. Investacorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Ted Kubala, Jr. v. Supreme Production Svc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  5. Fozard v. C.R. England, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API