Legal Opinion

State v. Webb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1951No. 218PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WiNBORNE, J'.

Tbe defendant Royall bas not appealed from judgment on tbe verdict rendered against bim. So tbis appeal is concerned witb tbe defendants Paul Webb and Carson Webb wbo bave appealed from tbe judgments on verdicts against tbem. It challenges tbe correctness of tbe action of tbe trial court in overruling tbeir demurrers to tbe evidence. G.S. 15-173. When so challenged, tbe evidence is to be taken in tbe light most favorable to tbe State. So considered under applicable principles of law, we bold that tbe evidence shown in tbe record is not sufficient.

In this State it' is unlawful for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  3. State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. State v. . MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. NeedhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API