Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 21, 1959No. 37631PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

“The marking of the case in default is a judgment, but not a ‘judgment by default’. At most, it can only be a judgment to the effect that the case is ‘in default’, and in no sense is it a rendition of a final judgment against the defendant in response to the prayers of the petition.” Love v. National Liberty Ins. Co., 157 Ga. 259, 262 (121 S. E. 648). Code (Ann.) § 110-404 provides as follows: “At any time before final judgment, the judge, in his discretion, upon payment of costs, may allow the default to be opened for providential cause preventing the filing of a plea, or for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Love v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Tucker v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Brucker v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Strickland v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Ezzard v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. First National Insurance Co. of America v. ThainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API