Strudwick v. . Shaw
Superior Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
1. It does not appear that there has been any actual possession in the lessor of the plaintiff, or the persons under whom he claims, since 1728; therefore, if the plaintiff ever had a right to recover in an action of ejectment, that right has been lost by his laches.(6) The nature of the title to lands is such as to make it divisible into three distinct species of property or kinds of right. It may consist of the naked possession or a right of possession, or a mere rightof property. The first may happen where a person in this country should enter upon a woodland, though granted estate, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. SalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1843
- Tyson v. . HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849