Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1920No. 5775PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

The conviction is for theft. The appellant, while in possession of an automobile belonging to the witness Gillam, sold the car. The State’s theory is that the appellant was a bailee, and fraudulently converted the property; and he is charged under the statute covering theft by bailee, Article 1348, Penal Code. The appellant’s theory, developed by his testimony, is that the owner put the car in his possession, and gave him authority to sell it.

The foreman of the grand jury returning the indictment was W. L. Carwyle, and A. A. Jackson was a member of the grand jury. The indictment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  2. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Brunk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API