Getto v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia
We originally issued our decision as an unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23 (166 Ill. 2d R. 23). The City of Chicago (the City) filed a petition for rehearing. Joseph Getto also filed a petition for rehearing, even though he filed no brief on appeal. We granted both, withdrew our Rule 23 decision, and now file this opinion in light of the additional filings by both sides.
This action first arose from a filing by Mr. Getto seeking to prevent the City from terminating water service to his property while he disputed a $120,019.49 water bill. Mr. Getto later amended his complaint,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Morrison v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- MD Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. AbramsIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ExsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Asset Acceptance, LLC v. TylerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241 v. Illinois Labor Relationws Board, Local PanelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Compass Group v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Asset Acceptance, LLC v. TylerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Getto v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009