Legal Opinion
Norris v. Lynch
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 8, 1921No. 11743PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Distraint'; from city court of Carrollton — Judge Beall. Jury 1,- 1920.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. If tlie court erred in tlie admission of certain irrelevant and immaterial evidence as complained of in tlie first and second grounds of tlie amendment to tlie motion for new trial, this evidence-was not of such materiality as to require the grant of a new trial. See Arnold v. Stevens, 139 Ga. 495 (77 S. E. 579) ; Ga., Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co. v. Parsons, 12 Ga. App. 180(6) (76 S. E. 1063).
2. “Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a portion thereof is-admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitted.” City…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- City of Atlanta v. ScipleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Eckman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Thacher v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Arnold v. StevensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. Inter-State Business Men's Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Guaranty Life Insurance v. PrimoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927