Rice v. Shoemaker

CAMMACK, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment fixing, a boundary line between the lands of the appellant, G. P. Rice, and those of the ap-pellee, C. M. Shoemaker. The action was brought by Shoemaker to recover damages for timber allegedly cut and removed from his land by Rice and Alfred Foster, the other appellant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Shoemaker in the sum of $157.50. The court entered judgment thereon, and, in addition, established the boundary line between the lands in question. A supplemental judgment was entered fixing the value of the land in controversy at $2,500.

Th…